DRT Matters

  • DRT Matters

Debt Recovery Tribunals: Where Banks and Borrowers Fight It Out

The Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) was established under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 (RDBA) specifically to fast-track recovery of dues owed to banks and financial institutions. If a bank or NBFC has outstanding dues above ₹20 lakh from a borrower, the DRT is typically where that dispute will be resolved.

For lenders, the DRT is a tool for enforcing legitimate debt claims without going through the slower civil court process. For borrowers, it’s a forum where they can challenge recovery proceedings, contest the quantum of dues, and in some cases, seek relief against SARFAESI actions taken by the bank.

Adv. Shailendra Singh represents both lenders and borrowers before the Delhi DRT and has appeared in appeals before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT). His experience on both sides of the dispute gives him a practical understanding of how these cases actually play out — and what arguments are most likely to be persuasive.

Our DRT Practice

  • For Banks and Financial Institutions — Original Applications (OA): Filing Original Applications (OA) under the RDBA for recovery of outstanding dues.
  • For Banks and Financial Institutions — Interim Orders: Obtaining interim orders — attachment of property before judgment under Section 19(7).
  • For Banks and Financial Institutions — Execution: Executing recovery certificates after orders are passed.
  • For Banks and Financial Institutions — Counter-claims: Defending against counter-claims and set-offs raised by borrowers.
  • For Banks and Financial Institutions — DRAT Appeals: Representing banks in DRAT appeals filed by aggrieved borrowers.
  • For Borrowers and Guarantors — Counter-claims: Filing counter-claims against the bank where dues are disputed or illegal charges have been imposed.
  • For Borrowers and Guarantors — SARFAESI Challenges: Challenging SARFAESI actions — including symbolic and physical possession of secured assets.
  • For Borrowers and Guarantors — Stay of Recovery: Seeking stay of recovery proceedings pending resolution of the underlying dispute.
  • For Borrowers and Guarantors — Guarantor Representation: Representing guarantors who have been impleaded by banks and are contesting their liability.
  • For Borrowers and Guarantors — DRAT Appeals: DRAT appeals against DRT orders where legal errors or procedural violations can be demonstrated.

SARFAESI Act and DRT

The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI) gives secured creditors the power to take possession of and sell secured assets without court intervention — as long as the prescribed procedure is followed.

Borrowers can challenge SARFAESI actions before the DRT under Section 17 of the Act. This is a time-bound remedy — applications must be filed within 45 days of the SARFAESI notice or action being challenged. Missing this deadline can result in losing the right to challenge the bank’s action entirely.

Adv. Shailendra Singh advises borrowers on SARFAESI challenges, the strength of available grounds, and the urgency of filing before the limitation period expires.

Personal Insolvency at the DRT

Following the notification of relevant provisions of the IBC, the DRT also handles applications for insolvency resolution of individuals and partnership firms under Part III of the Code. This includes Fresh Start applications, individual insolvency resolution applications, and bankruptcy petitions where resolution has failed.

Need Any Help?

Need Any Help, Call Us 24/7 For Support

Office Address

1112, 11th Floor, Ansal Bhawan, 16 K.G. Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001

Frequently Asked Questions

Have Any Questions?

The threshold for filing an Original Application in the DRT is ₹20 lakh. Claims below this threshold are handled by the appropriate civil court.

Yes. A borrower can apply to the DRT for a stay of SARFAESI proceedings under Section 17. The DRT has the power to restore possession if it finds the bank's action was not in accordance with the law.

The RDBA provides for disposal of Original Applications within 180 days. In practice, timelines vary — but DRT proceedings are significantly faster than equivalent civil court litigation for debt recovery matters.

Yes. A guarantor who has been proceeded against by the bank can file a separate application or counter-claim before the DRT, and can also challenge any SARFAESI action taken against the guarantor's property.